Witness The End Of Hunting: Why We Need A ‘Recklessness’ Clause

10th November 2025

The Hunt Saboteurs Association has produced a booklet titled ‘Witness The End Of Hunting’ which outlines our plans to stop hunters in their tracks or – at least – get them into court with a high chance of prosecution.

With the government’s consultation on hunting to begin “early in the new year” this is the first in a series of bulletins focusing on the different areas we are promoting to really stop hunting with hounds.

Another “unfortunate accident.”

A Recklessness Clause

Introducing a ‘Recklessness Clause’ would make it an offence to be the cause of any mammal’s death. It would encourage proper behaviour from those with packs of dogs, as the onus would be on the person in charge of the animals to prevent such activity. It would align with the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953, which puts the responsibility on the person in charge of the dog(s) in question.

Reckless: he knows foxes are likely to be lying up here.

At present, the general defence used by hunts on the rare occasions they end up in court on a Hunting Act charge is that the chasing and/or killing of an animal was an accident. They usually claim that the hounds simply drifted off a trail and that it was an accident and much regretted by all involved.

Sabs keep tabs as hounds are drawn through fox habitat.

The fact that hounds will have been introduced into coverts, kale fields and other dense undergrowth in the ‘search’ is not covered by the Hunting Act as it stands. The present act was drafted with no real definition of hunting, so this has been left up to the courts who have defined hunting to exclude the searching or seeking of wildlife. The HSA will be pushing for a definition which includes searching and seeking to be part of the hunting process and thus covered by the act.

Warwickshire Hunt searching for foxes.

This – alongside a recklessness clause – would put the onus on the hunt to take all necessary action to prevent any occurrences of finding or killing an animal. This would not prevent all current hunting activity but, alongside other changes we are suggesting, it would be a major step towards stopping the deliberate killing of wildlife and brushing it off as an accident.

You can download our Witness The End Of Hunting booklet here:

One Reply to “”


  1. WHY IS THIS USELESS GOVERNMENT ARE NOT GETTING ON TOP OF ALL THIS ILLEGAL HUNTING 21 YEARS NOW SINCE THE BAN AND THE OTHER USELESS LOT DID NOTHING. THESE HUNT MURDERERS ARE THE SCUM OF THE EARTH AND TIME THEY WERE STOPPED FROM MURDERING OF INNOCENT ANIMALS. I HAVE EMAILED THE GOVERNMENT RECENTLY RE FIREWORKS AND HOW IT EFFECTS ANIMALS AND ACCUSED THEM OF NOT GIVING A DAM ABOUT ANY ANIMAL WHICH IS TRUE. THE BADGER CULL IS BEING PHASED OUT WHY NOT JUST STOP NOW THEY REALLY ARE A USELESS LOT. THESE HUNT FILTH SHOULD BE IN PRISON FOR BREAKING THE LAW AND LYING. IF YOU GET CAUGHT DRIVING WITHOUT A LICENCE OR TAX OR INSURANCE I WOULD ASSUME THEY WOULD TAKE THE CAR OFF YOU SO WHY NOT TAKE THE HORSES AND DOGS OFF THESE THUGS?????????????????

Leave a Reply

Discover more from NORTH WEST HUNT SABOTEURS

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading